Enterprise Audit and Assurance Command Centre
Anonymised sector pattern. Client identity is not disclosed. Outcome language describes qualitative operating improvements only — no invented metrics.
Challenge
Assurance teams struggled to maintain a unified view of findings, evidence and remediation ownership. Document-heavy reviews slowed cycles, and leadership lacked a reliable command picture of open exceptions.
Context
The enterprise required an AI-enabled assurance command centre that could improve visibility and evidence handling without weakening segregation of duties or audit defensibility.
Agrayian approach
We mapped the assurance lifecycle from finding capture through evidence linkage, exception prioritisation and remediation tracking. OneTouch Audit was implemented as the operating surface, with document intelligence assisting analysts while preserving human validation of conclusions.
Solution architecture
A command-centre architecture connected findings, working papers and remediation tasks into a governed workflow. Document intelligence supported extraction and summarisation for analyst review. Dashboards gave risk and audit leadership a consolidated exception and closure status view.
Governance approach
AI outputs were treated as analyst aids, not automated audit opinions. Access to evidence was permissioned. Action ownership and closure authority remained with designated assurance roles. Activity trails supported internal review and quality assurance.
Outcome category — Audit and Control Visibility
- • Clearer visibility of open exceptions and remediation ownership.
- • More consistent evidence packaging for assurance reviews.
- • Reduced dependence on fragmented tracking spreadsheets.
- • Stronger confidence that AI assistance remained within audit control boundaries.